ANALISIS SWOT PENGGUNAAN CHAT GPT DALAM DUNIA PENDIDIKAN ISLAM
Abstract
Chat GPT is an artificial intelligence tool that has sparked debate regarding its implications for the world of education. Researchers use a qualitative method with a SWOT analysis framework approach to describe the strengths and weaknesses of ChatGPT, as well as discuss its opportunities and threats to Islamic education. Its strengths include the use of advanced natural language models to generate reasonable answers, the ability to improve itself, and the provision of personal and real-time responses. Thus, ChatGPT can enhance access to information, facilitate personalized and complex learning, and reduce the teaching workload, making processes and tasks more efficient. Its weaknesses include a lack of deep understanding, difficulty in evaluating the quality of responses, the risk of bias and discrimination, and a lack of high-level thinking skills. The threats to education include a lack of contextual understanding, threatening academic integrity, promoting discrimination in education, democratizing plagiarism, and the decline of high-level cognitive skills.
Downloads
References
Aljanabi, Mohammad. “ChatGPT: Future Directions and Open Possibilities.” Mesopotamian journal of Cybersecurity 2023 (2023): 16–17.
Ausat, Abu Muna Almaududi, Berdinata Massang, Mukhtar Efendi, Nofirman Nofirman, and Yasir Riady. “Can Chat GPT Replace the Role of the Teacher in the Classroom: A Fundamental Analysis.” Journal on Education 5, no. 4 (2023): 16100–16106.
Baidoo-Anu, David, and Leticia Owusu Ansah. “Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning.” Available at SSRN 4337484 (2023).
Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem, Omid Noroozi, Stan van Ginkel, Leah P Macfadyen, and Harm J A Biemans. “A Systematic Review of the Role of Learning Analytics in Enhancing Feedback Practices in Higher Education.” Educational Research Review (2022): 100489.
Baymurzina, D, Yu Kuratov, D Kuznetsov, D Kornev, and M Burtsev. “Evaluation of Conversational Skills for Commonsense” (2021).
Beltrami, Eric J, and Jane Margaret Grant-Kels. “Consulting ChatGPT: Ethical Dilemmas in Language Model Artificial Intelligence.” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2023).
Benzaghta, Mostafa Ali, Abdulaziz Elwalda, Mousa Mohamed Mousa, Ismail Erkan, and Mushfiqur Rahman. “SWOT Analysis Applications: An Integrative Literature Review.” Journal of Global Business Insights 6, no. 1 (2021): 55–73.
Biswas, Som. “Role of ChatGPT in Computer Programming.: ChatGPT in Computer Programming.” Mesopotamian Journal of Computer Science 2023 (2023): 8–16.
Bogost, Ian. “ChatGPT Is Dumber than You Think: Treat It like a Toy, Not a Tool.” The Atlantic (2022).
Borji, Ali. “A Categorical Archive of Chatgpt Failures.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03494 (2023).
Bridgman, Heather, Marie-Louise Bird, Karina Jane Heyworth, Greer Maine, Sibella Georgia Hardcastle, Sandra Lea Murray, Jan Radford, Shandell Lee Elmer, Kimberley Anne Norris, and Tracey Dean. “Evaluating an Interprofessional Workshop on Persistent Pain: The Role of Adult Learning and Social Identity Theories.” Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching 3, no. Sp. Iss. 1 (2020): 129–139.
Caldarini, Guendalina, Sardar Jaf, and Kenneth McGarry. “A Literature Survey of Recent Advances in Chatbots.” Information 13, no. 1 (2022): 41.
Cascella, Marco, Jonathan Montomoli, Valentina Bellini, and Elena Bignami. “Evaluating the Feasibility of ChatGPT in Healthcare: An Analysis of Multiple Clinical and Research Scenarios.” Journal of Medical Systems 47, no. 1 (2023): 33.
Castelvecchi, Davide. “Are ChatGPT and AlphaCode Going to Replace Programmers?” Nature (2022).
Choi, Jonathan H, Kristin E Hickman, Amy Monahan, and Daniel Schwarcz. “Chatgpt Goes to Law School.” Available at SSRN (2023).
Christiano, Paul F, Jan Leike, Tom Brown, Miljan Martic, Shane Legg, and Dario Amodei. “Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences.” Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
Deng, Jianyang, and Yijia Lin. “The Benefits and Challenges of ChatGPT: An Overview.” Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems 2, no. 2 (2022): 81–83.
Dimitrov, M. “What Business Leaders Should Know about Using LLMS like ChatGPT,” 2023.
Dwivedi, Yogesh K, Nir Kshetri, Laurie Hughes, Emma Louise Slade, Anand Jeyaraj, Arpan Kumar Kar, Abdullah M Baabdullah, Alex Koohang, Vishnupriya Raghavan, and Manju Ahuja. “‘So What If ChatGPT Wrote It?’ Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI for Research, Practice and Policy.” International Journal of Information Management 71 (2023): 102642.
Faiz, Aiman, and Imas Kurniawaty. “Tantangan Penggunaan ChatGPT Dalam Pendidikan Ditinjau Dari Sudut Pandang Moral.” Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan 5, no. 1 (2023): 456–463.
Fijačko, Nino, Lucija Gosak, Gregor Štiglic, Christopher T Picard, and Matthew John Douma. “Can ChatGPT Pass the Life Support Exams without Entering the American Heart Association Course?” Resuscitation 185 (2023).
Finkle, Todd A, and Evan Masters. “Do MOOCs Pose a Threat to Higher Education?.” Research in Higher Education Journal 26 (2014).
Fitria, Tira Nur. “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology in OpenAI ChatGPT Application: A Review of ChatGPT in Writing English Essay.” In ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12:44–58, 2023.
Gao, Catherine A, Frederick M Howard, Nikolay S Markov, Emma C Dyer, Siddhi Ramesh, Yuan Luo, and Alexander T Pearson. “Comparing Scientific Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT to Original Abstracts Using an Artificial Intelligence Output Detector, Plagiarism Detector, and Blinded Human Reviewers.” bioRxiv (2022): 2012–2022.
Gupta, Puneet, Swati Raturi, and P Venkateswarlu. “Chatgpt for Designing Course Outlines: A Boon or Bane to Modern Technology.” Available at SSRN 4386113 (2023).
Gupta, Rohun, John B Park, Chirag Bisht, Isabel Herzog, Joseph Weisberger, John Chao, Kongkrit Chaiyasate, and Edward S Lee. “Expanding Cosmetic Plastic Surgery Research with ChatGPT.” Aesthetic Surgery Journal (2023): sjad069.
Haque, Mubin Ul, Isuru Dharmadasa, Zarrin Tasnim Sworna, Roshan Namal Rajapakse, and Hussain Ahmad. “‘ I Think This Is the Most Disruptive Technology’: Exploring Sentiments of ChatGPT Early Adopters Using Twitter Data.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.05856 (2022).
Joksimovic, Srecko, Dirk Ifenthaler, Rebecca Marrone, Maarten De Laat, and George Siemens. “Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence for Supporting Complex Problem-Solving: Findings from a Scoping Review.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence (2023): 100138.
Kitamura, Felipe C. “ChatGPT Is Shaping the Future of Medical Writing but Still Requires Human Judgment.” Radiology. Radiological Society of North America, 2023.
Köbis, Nils, and Luca D Mossink. “Artificial Intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental Evidence That People Cannot Differentiate AI-Generated from Human-Written Poetry.” Computers in human behavior 114 (2021): 106553.
Kumar, Arun H S. “Analysis of ChatGPT Tool to Assess the Potential of Its Utility for Academic Writing in Biomedical Domain.” Biology, Engineering, Medicine and Science Reports 9, no. 1 (2023): 24–30.
Lecler, Augustin, Loïc Duron, and Philippe Soyer. “Revolutionizing Radiology with GPT-Based Models: Current Applications, Future Possibilities and Limitations of ChatGPT.” Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 104, no. 6 (2023): 269–274.
Li, Zekang, Cheng Niu, Fandong Meng, Yang Feng, Qian Li, and Jie Zhou. “Incremental Transformer with Deliberation Decoder for Document Grounded Conversations.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.08854 (2019).
Liu, Yiheng, Tianle Han, Siyuan Ma, Jiayue Zhang, Yuanyuan Yang, Jiaming Tian, Hao He, Antong Li, Mengshen He, and Zhengliang Liu. “Summary of Chatgpt/Gpt-4 Research and Perspective towards the Future of Large Language Models.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01852 (2023).
Mizumoto, Atsushi, and Masaki Eguchi. “Exploring the Potential of Using an AI Language Model for Automated Essay Scoring.” Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 2, no. 2 (2023): 100050.
Ouyang, Fan, Luyi Zheng, and Pengcheng Jiao. “Artificial Intelligence in Online Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research from 2011 to 2020.” Education and Information Technologies 27, no. 6 (2022): 7893–7925.
Perera, Pethigmage, and Madushan Lankathilaka. “AI in Higher Education: A Literature Review of ChatGPT and Guidelines for Responsible Implementation.” International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science 7, no. 6 (2023): 306–314.
Purwarianti, Ayu. “Implikasi ChatGPT Dan AI Bagi Pendidikan Tinggi Dan Perpustakaan Di Masa Depan” (2023).
Qadir, Junaid. “Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education.” In 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1–9. IEEE, 2023.
Rizki, Muhammad Alvan, Mahardika Darmawan Kusuma Wardana, and Hendri Hermawan. “Revolutionizing Education: The Impact of GPT AI Chat on Curriculum Efficiency and Civil Engineering Student Performance.” Academia Open 8 (2023).
Rochman, Ibnu. “Analisis SWOT Dalam Lembaga Pendidikan (Studi Kasus Di SMP Islam Yogyakarta).” Al Iman: Jurnal Keislaman Dan Kemasyarakatan 3, no. 1 (2019): 36–52.
Rushton, Alison. “Formative Assessment: A Key to Deep Learning?” Medical teacher 27, no. 6 (2005): 509–513.
Sallam, Malik. “The Utility of ChatGPT as an Example of Large Language Models in Healthcare Education, Research and Practice: Systematic Review on the Future Perspectives and Potential Limitations.” medRxiv (2023): 2002–2023.
Setiawan, Adi, and Ulfah Khairiyah Luthfiyani. “Penggunaan ChatGPT Untuk Pendidikan Di Era Education 4.0: Usulan Inovasi Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis.” JURNAL PETISI (Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi) 4, no. 1 (2023): 49–58.
Shen, Yiqiu, Laura Heacock, Jonathan Elias, Keith D Hentel, Beatriu Reig, George Shih, and Linda Moy. “ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models Are Double-Edged Swords.” Radiology. Radiological Society of North America, 2023.
Sinha, Ranwir K, Asitava Deb Roy, Nikhil Kumar, Himel Mondal, and Ranwir Sinha. “Applicability of ChatGPT in Assisting to Solve Higher Order Problems in Pathology.” Cureus 15, no. 2 (2023).
Sobania, Dominik, Martin Briesch, Carol Hanna, and Justyna Petke. “An Analysis of the Automatic Bug Fixing Performance of Chatgpt.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.08653 (2023).
Stokel-Walker, Chris, and Richard Van Noorden. “What ChatGPT and Generative AI Mean for Science.” Nature 614, no. 7947 (2023): 214–216.
Susnjak, Teo. “ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09292 (2022).
Villarroel, Verónica, Susan Bloxham, Daniela Bruna, Carola Bruna, and Constanza Herrera-Seda. “Authentic Assessment: Creating a Blueprint for Course Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43, no. 5 (2018): 840–854.
Da Xu, Li, Yang Lu, and Ling Li. “Embedding Blockchain Technology into IoT for Security: A Survey.” IEEE Internet of Things Journal 8, no. 13 (2021): 10452–10473.
Zhai, Chunpeng. “A Systematic Review on Artificial Intelligence Dialogue Systems for Enhancing English as Foreign Language Students’ Interactional Competence in the University.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence (2023): 100134.
Zhai, Xiaoming. “ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education.” Available at SSRN 4312418 (2022).
Copyright (c) 2024 Renti Yasmar, Dian Risky Amalia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.