Nurcholish Madjid Desacralization and Contemporary Religious Authority

  • Sukma Mulia Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Adenan Adenan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Keywords: Religious Authority, Desacralization, Nurcholish Madjid, Tawhid, Modern Religious Life

Abstract

Nurcholish Madjid’s concept of desacralization emerged from his concern over the tendency to treat human interpretations, religious authorities, and worldly interests as sacred and absolute. This issue remains relevant to contemporary religious life, particularly in the cult of religious figures and the use of religious identity in political competition. This study aims to analyze the foundations of Madjid’s concept of desacralization and examine its relevance to contemporary religious authority and identity politics. The study employs a qualitative approach through library research using a descriptive-analytical method. The primary source is Nurcholish Madjid’s Islam, Doctrine and Civilization, supported by relevant scholarly literature on desacralization, religious authority, and identity politics. The study finds that Madjid’s desacralization operates through two related mechanisms: desacralizing human authority and distinguishing religious values from contingent political interests. The first mechanism places religious figures, their interpretations, and intellectual products within the realm of human and relative authority, thereby allowing them to be examined critically rather than treated as absolute. The second mechanism separates Islamic religious values from political interests, preventing political choices, institutions, and identities from acquiring religious legitimacy simply through the use of religious symbols.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdussamad, Z. (2022). Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. OSF Preprints, OSF Preprints, Article juwxn. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/juwxn

Ajeng, F. A. (2026). Pancasila Spectrum: Jurnal Multidisiplin Moderasi Beragama sebagai Proyek Intelektual: Telaah Konseptual atas Rekonstruksi Islam Modern Nurcholish Madjid. Pancasila Spectrum: Jurnal Multidisiplin, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.67315/pancasilaspectrum.v1i01.3

Ali, S. (2022). Politik Identitas Agama (Studi kasus politisasi agama pada pemilihan Bupati Morotai 2011). Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(3), 178–183. https://www.jurnal.peneliti.net/index.php/JIWP/article/view/225

Aqil, H. L. (2025). Media Sosial Dan Transformasi Dakwah ( Analisis Intermedialitas Pada Konten Kajian Gus Baha ). Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.15642/jik.2025.15.1.43-54

Azamudin, A., Rusdy, M., & Munir, M. I. A. (2025). Analisis Komparatif Pemikiran Sekularisasi Politik Islam: Ali Abd Raziq dan Nurcholish Madjid. Journal Sains Student Research, 3(2), 197–211. https://ejurnal.kampusakademik.co.id/index.php/jssr/article/view/4118

Barton, G. (1999). Gagasan Islam Liberal di Indonesia: Pemikiran Neo-Modernisme Nurcholish Madjid, Djohan Effendi, Ahmad Wahib, dan Abdurrahman Wahid, Terj. Nanang Tahqiq. Paramadina.

Didik Lutfi Hakim. (2014). Monotheisme Radikal. Teologia, 25(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2014.25.2.383

Dito Alif Pratama. (2023). Islam and Neo-Modernism in Indonesia: Revisiting Nurcholish Madjid and Abdurrahman Wahid’S Thought on Civil Society. Al’Adalah, 26(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.35719/aladalah.v26i2.371

Effendy, B. (1998). Islam dan Negara: Transformasi Pemikiran dan Praktik Politik Islam di Indonesia. Paramadina.

Fadil, F., Mahmudi, Z., & Attarwiyah, N. M. (2026). Desakralisasi dan rasionalisasi agama: Studi kritis atas pemikiran Nurcholish Madjid dalam lanskap Islam kontemporer. Jurnal Ikhtibar Nusantara, 5(2), 217–234. https://jurnal.stainusantara.ac.id/index.php/ikhtibar-nusantara/article/view/478

Fautanu, I., M, B., & Gunawan, H. (2020). Political Identity in DKI Jakarta Election 2017: Perspective of Nurcholish Madjid Political Thinking. Politicon: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 2(2), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.15575/politicon.v2i2.8146

Fiantika, F. R. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Rake Sarasin (Issue March).

Hidayat, K. & M. Noer. (2001). Agama di Tengah Kemelut. Mediacita.

Kitiarsa, P. (2008). Religious Commodifications in Asia: Marketing Gods. Routledge.

Madjid, N. (1992). Islam, Doktrin dan Peradaban: Sebuah Telaah Kritis tentang Masalah Keimanan, Kemanusiaan, dan Kemodernan. Yayasan Wakaf Paramadina.

Madjid, N. (2008). Islam Kemodernan dan Keindonesiaan (Cet. ke-12). Mizan.

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (edisi revs). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muhammad Nur Ilham, Darussalam Syamsuddin, & Syahrir Karim. (2024). Telaah Pemikiran Nurcholish Madjid Terhadap Politik Identitas. Tasamuh: Jurnal Studi Islam, 16(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.47945/tasamuh.v16i2.1546

Muhtadi, B. (2019). Populisme, Politik Identitas, dan Dinamika Elektoral: Mengurai Jalan Panjang Pilgub DKI 2017. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik (JSP), 22(3), 185–188. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.43821

Munawar-Rachman, B. (2006). Ensiklopedia Nurcholish Madjid: Pemikiran Islam di Kanvas Peradaban (Jilid 2). Mizan.

Musawamah, A., Amaliyah, N., Al-Ayyubi, S., & Rosa, A. (2025). Islamic Political Reform in Indonesia: The Relevance of the Thoughts of Nurcholish Madjid and Abdurrahman Wahid. Staatsrecht Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan Dan Politik Islam, 5(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.14421/3zb3z667

Nasution, A. F. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. In A. Meyniar (Ed.), Sustainability (Switzerland) (cetakan pe, Vol. 11, Issue 1). CV. Harfa Creative.

Rasjidi, H. M. (1972). Koreksi terhadap Drs. Nurcholish Madjid tentang Sekularisasi. Bulan Bintang.
Published
2026-10-04
How to Cite
Mulia, Sukma, and Adenan Adenan. FiTUA: JURNAL STUDI ISLAM 7, no. 2 (October 4, 2026): 16-26. Accessed October 9, 2026. http://ejournal.stitbima.ac.id/index.php/fitua/article/view/1499.
Section
Articles