Differences in Qirā’āt as the Basis for Diversity in Qur’anic Interpretation

A Study from the Perspective of the Science of Tafsir

  • Moh Bahtiar Ahadi Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram, Indonesia
  • Nurusshobah Nurusshobah Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram, Indonesia
  • Hasan Ismail Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Taufiq Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram, Indonesia
  • Ilham Dhya’ul Wahid Al-Azhar University, Egypt
Keywords: Qirā’āt variation, Qur’anic interpretation, Tafsīr dynamics

Abstract

The diversity of qirā’āt has long been recognized as an integral component of the Qur’anic transmission tradition and has played a significant role in shaping the richness of Qur’anic interpretation. However, its function as an epistemological basis for interpretive diversity has not received sufficient attention in many contemporary studies, which tend to focus on the technical aspects of recitation. This study aims to examine the role of authentic qirā’āt in generating interpretive diversity and to explain its position within the framework of ‘Ulūm al-Tafsīr. This research employs a qualitative library research design using content analysis of primary sources on qirā’āt and Qur’anic exegesis, complemented by relevant classical and contemporary scholarly literature. The analysis demonstrates that differences among authentic qirā’āt extend beyond phonetic variation and significantly influence lexical meaning, grammatical construction, legal reasoning, and theological interpretation. These variations provide exegetes with multiple yet equally authoritative textual perspectives, enabling a broader understanding of Qur’anic messages without compromising the integrity of the Qur’anic text. The study further reveals that classical and contemporary mufassirs consistently integrate authentic qirā’āt with linguistic analysis, contextual interpretation, and prophetic traditions to construct comprehensive interpretations of Qur’anic verses. Therefore, interpretive diversity arising from qirā’āt should be understood as a manifestation of the Qur’an’s linguistic depth and semantic richness rather than as a source of contradiction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdel Haleem, M. A. S. (2021). The Qur'an and Its Linguistic and Rhetorical Features. Religions, 12(8), 604.

Al Farabi, F. A., Kanzu, M. K., Rohman, A., & Aziz, I. H. (2024). Epistemological Study of Ḥasan Baṣrī's Qirā'ah: Methodology and Its Implications in Qur'anic Interpretation. Journal of Qur'an and Hadith Studies, 13(1).

Al-‘Arabi, I. (2003). Aḥkām al-Qur’ān (Vol. 3). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Hāsani, M. b. ‘A. al-Maliki. (1423 H). Al-Qawā‘id al-Asāsiyyah fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān (2nd ed.). Maktabah al-Malik Fahd al-Waṭaniyyah.

Al-Ismail, N. b. M. I. (1419 H). ‘Ilm al-Qirā’āt: Nasy’atuhu, Aṭwāruhu, Ātsāruhu fī al-‘Ulūm al-Syar‘iyyah. Maktabah al-Taubah.

Al-Jamal, ‘A. (1420 H). Al-Mughnī fī ‘Ilm al-Tajwīd. Āfāq li al-Ṭibā‘ah wa al-Nasyr.

Al-Mutairi, A. S. (2023). The Global Dominance of Ḥafṣ ‘an ‘Āṣim: Historical Roots and Contemporary Developments. Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 25(3), 67–89.

Al-Qattan, M. K. (2000). Mabāḥith fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Ma‘ārif.

Al-Qurṭubī. (1964). Al-Jāmi‘ li Aḥkām al-Qur’ān (Vol. 2). Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah.

Al-Rāzī, F. (1420 H). Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb (Vol. 3). Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.

Al-Ṣāliḥ, Ṣ. (2000). Mabāḥith fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-‘Ilm li al-Malāyīn.

Al-Sindi, A. Q. b. ‘A. G. (2021). Al-Madkhal ilā ‘Ilm al-Qirā’āt (2nd ed.). Dār Waqf Aḍwā’ al-Syāṭibiyyah.

Al-Suyūṭī, J. al-Dīn. (2011). Al-Itqān fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Tunisi, M. al-Ṭāhir Ibn ‘Āsyūr. (1984). Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr (Vol. 18). Tunis: Al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah li al-Nasyr.

Aasyur, A. B. M. (2008). Al-Uṣūl al-Nayyirāt fī al-Qirā’āt (2nd ed.). Madār al-Waṭan li al-Nasyr.

Asnawi, A. R. (2023). Al-Muhimmāt fī ‘Ilm al-Qirā’āt. Gontor: UNIDA Press.

Bin Bazimul, M. b. ‘U. b. S. (1996). Al-Qirā’āt wa Ātsāruhā fī al-Tafsīr wa al-Aḥkām (Vol. 1). Dār al-Hijrah li al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzī‘.

Diraz, M. A. (1987). Madkhal ilā al-Qur’ān al-Karīm: ‘Arḍ Tārīkhī Taḥlīlī Muqārin. Kuwait: Dār al-Qalam.

Febra, G., Admizal, I., & Suriyadi. (2024). The Influence of Qira’at Variants in Interpretation Ayat-Ayat Al-Qur’an. Indonesia Journal of Engineering and Education Technology (IJEET), 2(2), 267–273, https://doi.org/10.61991/ijeet.v2i2.49

Fathurrozi, M. (2023). Analisis Qira’at Shahihah Perspektif Ibnu al-Jazari. Jurnal Semiotika-Q, 3(2), 319–332, https://doi.org/10.19109/jsq.v3i2.24817

Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method (2nd rev. ed.). London: Bloomsbury.

Gunarti, T. T., Ahmadi, M., & Ummah, F. T. (2024). The Impact of Qira’at on Interpretation: An Analytical Study of Farsh al-Ḥurūf in Tafsīr Marāḥ Labīd. Al-Itqan: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an, 10(1), 45–84, https://doi.org/10.47454/alitqan.v10i1.1020

Halimah, B. (2019). Perbedaan Qira’at dan Pengaruhnya dalam Istinbath Hukum. Jurnal Al-Risalah, 19, 11–22,
https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v19i1.9759

Istiqomah, H. N. A., & Sirojjudin, M. (2025). Transformasi Metodologis Ilmu Qira’at dalam Asy-Syathibiyyah dan Ṭayyibatun-Nasyr. Al-Tadabbur, 10(2), 340–359, https://doi.org/10.30868/at.v10i02.9335

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Muhammad Wahid, & Zaini, M. (2016). Pengantar ‘Ulūm al-Qur’an dan ‘Ulūm al-Hadis (Cet. 1). Banda Aceh: Yayasan Pena Banda Aceh.

Nasser, S. H. (2020). The Second Canonization of the Qur'an (324/936): Ibn Mujāhid and the Founding of the Seven Readings. Leiden: Brill.

Pink, J. (2020). Qur'anic Exegesis (Tafsir). Religions, 11(6), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11060314

Ridho, M. T., & Hariyanto, A. (2024). Konsep Sab‘atu Aḥruf dan Relasinya dengan Qira’at Sab‘ah: Tinjauan Sosio-Historis. Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam, 9(2), 307–330, https://doi.org/10.14421/mjsi.v9i2.3934

Sinai, N. (2023). Key Terms of the Qur'an: A Critical Dictionary. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Tareq Moqbel. (2023). The Second Canonization of the Qurʾān: A Review Article. Journal of Semitic Studies, https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgac020

Uqbah Amer, M., Muhammad Zaid Shamsul Qamar, & Mohamad Redha Mohamad. (2022). Implikasi Pentafsiran Qirā’āt Syādhdhah terhadap Ayat-Ayat Hukum dalam Surah Al-Baqarah. Jurnal Qiraat, 5(2), 24–33, https://doi.org/10.53840/jq.v5i2.42

Van Putten, M. (2022). Quranic Arabic: From Its Hijazi Beginnings to Its Classical Reading Traditions. Leiden: Brill.
Published
2026-08-10
How to Cite
Ahadi, Moh, Nurusshobah Nurusshobah, Hasan Ismail, Muhammad Taufiq, and Ilham Wahid. FiTUA: JURNAL STUDI ISLAM 7, no. 2 (August 10, 2026): 1-15. Accessed August 14, 2026. https://ejournal.stitbima.ac.id/index.php/fitua/article/view/1462.
Section
Articles